Wednesday, 11 April 2012

Beauty, Brawn and Business Sense

Champion natural bodybuilder, aerialist, dancer, fitness model... it’s hard to believe that Claire Harper could possibly fit anything else on that list. Yet she’s somehow she has managed to add the role of businesswoman to that impressive list of roles.

Despite the demanding training schedule that is required to be a top athlete, she’s managed to find the time to successfully launch and manage a welcome product to the UK fitness scene – the Smartshake.
The Smartshake is a breath of fresh air because it has three storage compartments which allow you to keep the items or supplements you need in one place while you are training. Vitamins, snacks, thermogenics, locker keys – whatever you want really. It’s so simple its genius.




On top of being the ultimate gym buddy, the product is BPA-free, recyclable, microwaveable, has leak proof technology and comes in different colours and sizes.

If anyone understands how important it is to have her everything she needs at her fingertips, it’s Claire. You don’t earn the titles of FAME Miss World Fitness Model Champion, BNBF Miss Northern Figure and NPA Miss North West Figure (to name a few) by leaving your diet and nutrition to chance.
Harper and co came across Smartshake at the Bodypower show and loved it as soon as they laid eyes on it. After using it for herself and truly understanding its usefulness, she couldn’t shake (no pun intended) the feeling that she needed to introduce this product to the UK on a wider level. Whilst on a holiday she put a plan together, set the wheels in motion and the rest is history.

Smartshake's entry into the UK has been positive - they've been spotted at fitness exhibitions, on the pages of OK! magazine and in the gym bags of fitness enthusiasts up and down the country. They've been so successful that copycats have already started to pop up, but this doesn't phase Harper. ‘Since we launched in the UK 18 months ago we have gone from hearing people say it would never work to seeing people try to create their own version. Imitation is meant to be the highest form of flattery so we must be doing something right!’

Spoken like a true champ!

To find out more check out: www.smartshake.co.uk

Friday, 2 March 2012

Too Tough For Men


Image courtesy of uwdigitalcollections

It is no coincidence that the only Olympic sports contested solely by women are the only ones that require athletes to wear eyeliner and lipstick. Rhythmic gymnasts and synchronised swimmers wear leotards and faces that spangle and glitter - the way you look is just as important as the way you move. Is this the last bastion of traditional lady-like behaviour in the face of muscular feminism?

Of course not; these athletes are as hard as weightlifters. Don’t be fooled by the elegance and grace, their sport only looks easy because they have the strength, flexibility and stamina to make it so. Mo Farah can stretch his gasping sinews every sweaty stride towards the finish line and Jess Ennis can lie thoroughly exhausted on the track after her 800ms, but our gymnasts have to show no exertion, no breathlessness and no effort.

To use the colloquial metaphor of the duck that is calm on the surface, but paddling like a train underneath, the hard labour is what the synchronised swimmer and rhythmic gymnast strives to hide from you. Perhaps if I refer to synchronised swimming’s original title of Water Ballet I can more convincingly convey the scale of the physical demands of the sport – at least to those of you who have seen Black Swan.

Minority sports are so because they are minor players in sports media coverage, but they are also widely minor in the realms of common sporting knowledge. Most people know what a ‘bicycle kick’ and ‘topspin’ refer to. Not so with the ‘egg beater’, ‘pusher’ and ‘stack lift’ and there is certainly no appreciation of how hard they might be to do.

Therein lies the opportunity of the London 2012 Olympic Games for these athletes. They have scraped through the last four years with comparatively less cash than their counterparts (synchronised swimming receives 3.46m per year compared to £20.66m awarded to swimming) or self funded (GB rhythmic gymnasts self funded their way to within 0.273 of a qualification for the 2012 Games).

This is their moment to shine but there is no Tom Daley or Louis Smith to put their sport on a viral video or You Tube. If you missed out on the Rhythmic Gymnastics in January 2012 buy tickets for the FINA Olympic Games Synchronised Swimming Qualification and see just what these women are made of.

Wednesday, 22 February 2012

Prevention is Better Than Cure

The boxing world got flipped on its head when two British boxers decided to bring a little taste of Finchley to Munich. Any achievements that either Haye or Chisora have earned to date will be always be overshadowed by their immature displays of aggression.
I personally blame both Klitschko brothers for the Haye v Chisora bonus undercard fight. When Chisora slapped Vitali in the press conference Vitali should have made it his duty to ensure that Chisora learned a lasting lesson about disrespect. If Chisora had had the taste knocked out of his mouth, he wouldn’t have had the wherewithal to square up to Haye. Fact.
Younger brother Wladimir also failed to adequately address the issue of disrespect. No opponent should ever be able to design apparel depicting images of your dismembered brother and not end up literally and figuratively KO’d.
Both Haye and Chisora took their pre-fight and press conference shenanigans to a place it didn’t need to go. Not only were they unable to back it up, there were no consequences to their actions which seemingly leading them to believing their own hype.
Now the sport of boxing has been brought into disrepute, Chisora’s been questioned by the police and Haye’s sporting achievements have been somewhat discredited. Not what you expect from professional athletes, eh?
The moral of this story is… the next time you have a job to do, do it properly.
J

Thursday, 16 February 2012

Plasters and Old Wounds

The UK’s social and institutional approach to racism in football has usurped headlines and timelines of late.
Last week alone we’ve seen Terry lose his arm band, Capello raise two fingers to the situation, Suarez miss the memo about handshakes and a Manchester United fan banned from football for three years for unacceptable behaviour.
Institutional responses to some of the recent offences feel inconsistent and haphazard because they are. England have been clear about their commitment to stamping out racism, but weren’t clear on how exactly to approach the issues.
Whilst the search is still on for the best approach to this inconvenient issue, England are at least making the effort to keep their social misfits from causing offence beyond UK borders. The Manchester United fan who was fined for racially abusing striker Kenwyne Jones has not only earned himself a three year ban from any football ground in England or Wales, he must also surrender his passport when England play internationals abroad.
Harsh? Maybe. Effective? Hopefully.
Whether or not other countries see the need to address the issue is another blog for another day.

Wednesday, 4 January 2012

A Second Look at Instant Replay

Technology and football is a combination many have been crying out for but to no avail. You would have thought that after the Hand of God incident officials would clamour at the opportunity to utilise technology in football matches but it seems those at the helm of FIFA don’t think it’s such a good idea.
During the Lakers v Bulls game on Christmas Day I noted how the referees were happy to use instant replay before giving a foul in instances where they were unsure. There was no booing from fans, there didn’t appear to be any resistance from players and the game was officiated fairly.
If football sought to utilise these resources, the recent match between Everton and Sunderland might have ended with a win for Sunderland. Those of us who watched the replays clearly saw that the only thing that brought Osman down in the penalty area was his own two feet. Despite the outrage from fans and players alike, a penalty was nonetheless rewarded and Sunderland had to settle for a draw.
There has always been the argument that introducing technology to football will have a negative impact on the pace of the game, but I suspect Sunderland fans will vehemently disagree with that sentiment. Technology doesn’t need to be cumbersome as is evidenced by its role in rugby, basketball, tennis and cricket.
Sepp Blatter reckons goal line technology could be in place by the 2012 – 2013 season, here’s hoping instant replays are introduced at the same time.